Contact Us

Please fill out the form below and our attorney will contact you.

!
!
!

Office Location

Martindale Awards

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale Ratings

Average Peer Rating

4.6/5.0

Average Client Rating

100% client recommended

Reviews (56)

Showing 3-star reviews and above
Review Us
Our reviews are compiled from our profiles on the legal directory Lawyers.com.

Site Rating Reviews by date
5.0 / 5.0
2014-05-15 09:41:02

No description provided

— Peer 05/15/2014

5.0 / 5.0
2014-05-09 18:09:30

No description provided

— Peer 05/09/2014

5.0 / 5.0
2014-05-09 16:14:36

IS the posterchild for super lawyer.

— Peer 05/09/2014

5.0 / 5.0
2014-05-07 11:15:20

Very experienced. Very thorough. Very knowledgeable. Preeminent.

— Peer 05/07/2014

5.0 / 5.0
2014-05-07 11:10:29

No description provided

— Peer 05/07/2014

5.0 / 5.0
2014-05-07 11:07:43

No description provided

— Peer 05/07/2014

5.0 / 5.0
2014-05-07 11:05:09

I have know Ben for many years and he is preeminent in his feild.

— Peer 05/07/2014

5.0 / 5.0
2014-05-07 10:46:16

No description provided

— Peer 05/07/2014

5.0 / 5.0
2014-05-07 10:43:59

No description provided

— Peer 05/07/2014

5.0 / 5.0
2013-03-12 09:58:35

No description provided

— Peer 03/12/2013

5.0 / 5.0
2013-02-23 16:34:16

Should be AV

— Peer 02/23/2013

5.0 / 5.0
2012-04-05 10:01:21

No description provided

— Peer 04/05/2012

5.0 / 5.0
2011-06-21

No description provided

— Client 06/21/2011

5.0 / 5.0
2011-06-08 09:40:12

No description provided

— Peer 06/08/2011

5.0 / 5.0
2010-09-27 07:41:57

No description provided

— Peer 09/27/2010

5.0 / 5.0
2010-09-22 11:05:35

No description provided

— Peer 09/22/2010

5.0 / 5.0
2010-09-22 11:05:03

No description provided

— Peer 09/22/2010

5.0 / 5.0
2010-08-27 13:49:12

No description provided

— Peer 08/27/2010

5.0 / 5.0
2010-08-26 12:41:44

No description provided

— Peer 08/26/2010

5.0 / 5.0
2010-08-26 12:32:43

No description provided

— Peer 08/26/2010

5.0 / 5.0
2010-08-26 10:06:51

Ms. Baukman is an excellent lawyer. She has a great analytical mind, while also possessing the ability to simplify the most complex issues.I trust her judgment. She is professional & ethical, and desreves an A+ rating.

— Peer 08/26/2010

5.0 / 5.0
2010-08-26 09:07:18

No description provided

— Peer 08/26/2010

5.0 / 5.0
2009-04-01 12:09:11

No description provided

— Peer 04/01/2009

4.8 / 5.0
2012-03-26 15:36:37

No description provided

— Peer 03/26/2012

4.8 / 5.0
2010-09-06 11:39:34

Excellent lawyer who does his homework.

— Peer 09/06/2010

4.8 / 5.0
2010-09-03 10:26:30

Mr. Carroll is an outstanding trial attorney. Great attention to detail. Superb persuasive ability. Hard worker.

— Peer 09/03/2010

4.6 / 5.0
2012-03-18 17:53:09

Deborah is an excellent attorney with a very good reputation in our legal community.

— Peer 03/18/2012

4.4 / 5.0
2014-05-15 08:12:58

No description provided

— Peer 05/15/2014

4.4 / 5.0
2010-09-27 07:41:18

No description provided

— Peer 09/27/2010

4.4 / 5.0
2010-09-23 07:20:26

No description provided

— Peer 09/23/2010

4.4 / 5.0
2009-04-01 12:09:11

No description provided

— Peer 04/01/2009

4.2 / 5.0
2012-03-26 15:26:10

No description provided

— Peer 03/26/2012

4.2 / 5.0
2012-03-24 16:11:46

No description provided

— Peer 03/24/2012

4.2 / 5.0
2009-04-01 12:09:11

No description provided

— Peer 04/01/2009

4.0 / 5.0
2014-05-15 09:40:10

No description provided

— Peer 05/15/2014

4.0 / 5.0
2013-03-13 10:16:16

No description provided

— Peer 03/13/2013

4.0 / 5.0
2013-02-25 09:14:28

No description provided

— Peer 02/25/2013

4.0 / 5.0
2012-04-09 11:12:19

No description provided

— Peer 04/09/2012

4.0 / 5.0
2012-03-23 09:38:26

No description provided

— Peer 03/23/2012

4.0 / 5.0
2012-03-19 11:55:01

Good Lawyer

— Peer 03/19/2012

4.0 / 5.0
2011-06-27 17:46:37

No description provided

— Peer 06/27/2011

4.0 / 5.0
2011-06-16 09:42:29

No description provided

— Peer 06/16/2011

4.0 / 5.0
2011-06-09 09:54:38

No description provided

— Peer 06/09/2011

4.0 / 5.0
2010-08-26 11:32:57

No description provided

— Peer 08/26/2010

4.0 / 5.0
2009-04-01 12:09:11

No description provided

— Peer 04/01/2009

4.0 / 5.0
2009-04-01 12:09:11

No description provided

— Peer 04/01/2009

4.0 / 5.0
2009-04-01 12:09:11

No description provided

— Peer 04/01/2009

3.8 / 5.0
2009-04-01 12:09:11

No description provided

— Peer 04/01/2009

3.6 / 5.0
2010-09-27 07:40:32

No description provided

— Peer 09/27/2010

3.6 / 5.0
2009-04-01 12:09:11

No description provided

— Peer 04/01/2009

3.4 / 5.0
2009-04-01 12:09:11

No description provided

— Peer 04/01/2009

3.2 / 5.0
2012-03-24 21:18:46

No description provided

— Peer 03/24/2012

3.0 / 5.0
2010-08-26 10:32:03

No description provided

— Peer 08/26/2010

3.0 / 5.0
2009-04-01 12:09:11

No description provided

— Peer 04/01/2009

3.0 / 5.0
2009-04-01 12:09:11

No description provided

— Peer 04/01/2009

3.0 / 5.0
2009-04-01 12:09:11

No description provided

— Peer 04/01/2009